PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAC.DE achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than QDVL.DE's 0.74% return.


PRAC.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.63%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*

QDVL.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.78%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
0.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRAC.DE
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A
0.60%3.03%4.31%7.53%-13.95%-1.04%1.51%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.74%2.81%4.24%4.30%-3.63%-0.34%0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAC.DE and QDVL.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2020

0.57

The correlation between PRAC.DE and QDVL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAC.DE
PRAC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRAC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVL.DE
QDVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRAC.DEQDVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.33

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

2.08

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

8.99

-6.34

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAC.DE and QDVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRAC.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.65

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

1.01

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.32

-0.30

Drawdowns

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, which is greater than QDVL.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAC.DE and QDVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAC.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.86%

-8.22%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-0.93%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.70%

-0.93%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.86%

-4.90%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-0.01%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-0.71%

-5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.22%

+0.56%

Volatility

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) at 0.34%. This indicates that PRAC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAC.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.34%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

1.02%

+1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

1.18%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

1.58%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

2.86%

+1.87%

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAC.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRAC.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

PRAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRAC.DE
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.91%3.04%2.95%1.95%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.27%0.13%0.12%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAC.DE and QDVL.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVL.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVL.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.DE.

PRAC.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PRAC.DE and 0.12% for QDVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAC.DE and QDVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer