PRAB vs. PSQO
PRAB (State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF) and PSQO (Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRAB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for PSQO.
Performance
PRAB vs. PSQO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRAB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSQO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRAB vs. PSQO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRAB State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF | 0.90% |
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAB and PSQO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRAB vs. PSQO — Risk / Return Rank
PRAB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSQO
PRAB vs. PSQO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF (PRAB) and Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRAB | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 33.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRAB vs. PSQO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAB drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum PSQO drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAB and PSQO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAB | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -0.76% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.26% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.11% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility
PRAB vs. PSQO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRAB | PSQO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14% | 1.61% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.14% | 2.00% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.14% | 2.00% | -0.86% |
PRAB vs. PSQO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PSQO's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRAB vs. PSQO - Dividend Comparison
PRAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than PSQO's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PRAB State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 4.54% | 4.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRAB and PSQO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRAB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for PSQO.
PSQO has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 1.49% for PRAB.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Palmer Square. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRAB and 0.52% for PSQO.
Find the right allocation for PRAB and PSQO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer