PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR1T.L achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than TRSX.L's -0.05% return.


PR1T.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*

TRSX.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PR1T.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)
1.46%4.22%5.20%4.83%0.61%0.09%-0.07%
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.05%8.02%-0.62%3.29%-14.99%-2.94%-1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PR1T.L and TRSX.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR1T.L
PR1T.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TRSX.L
TRSX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PR1T.LTRSX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+11.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+34.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

9.54

1.22

+8.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

68.61

1.61

+67.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

521.85

4.19

+517.66

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio is 12.95, which is higher than the TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR1T.L and TRSX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PR1T.LTRSX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.95

1.15

+11.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

8.38

-0.22

+8.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.41

0.15

+7.26

Drawdowns

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR1T.L drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum TRSX.L drawdown of -23.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1T.L and TRSX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PR1T.LTRSX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-23.50%

+22.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-4.05%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.06%

-7.35%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.56%

-20.96%

+20.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.55%

+10.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-11.02%

+10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

2.25%

-2.24%

Volatility

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) is 0.09%, while SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that PR1T.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRSX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PR1T.LTRSX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

1.87%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.21%

3.46%

-3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30%

5.73%

-5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

13.52%

-13.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.38%

13.53%

-13.15%

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PR1T.L and TRSX.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PR1T.L vs. TRSX.L - Dividend Comparison

PR1T.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRSX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PR1T.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.09%3.93%3.59%2.71%1.65%1.02%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


PR1T.L and TRSX.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1T.L and TRSX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

PR1T.L tracks Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index, while TRSX.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR1T.L and TRSX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer