PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L
PR1T.L (Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) and BB3M.L (JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD) are both exchange-traded funds - PR1T.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index, while BB3M.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. PR1T.L is passively managed, while BB3M.L is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PR1T.L returned 3.24%/yr vs 3.46%/yr for BB3M.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PR1T.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for BB3M.L.
Performance
PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PR1T.L having a 1.46% return and BB3M.L slightly higher at 1.48%.
PR1T.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
BB3M.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- —
PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR1T.L Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 1.46% | 4.22% | 5.20% | 4.83% | 0.61% | -0.04% |
BB3M.L JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD | 1.48% | 4.28% | 5.24% | 4.94% | 1.46% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PR1T.L and BB3M.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.19 |
The correlation between PR1T.L and BB3M.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (3 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L — Risk / Return Rank
PR1T.L
BB3M.L
PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) and JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PR1T.L | BB3M.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +28.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 9.54 | 2.14 | +7.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 68.61 | 28.84 | +39.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 521.85 | 103.10 | +418.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PR1T.L | BB3M.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.95 | 4.80 | +8.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 8.38 | 3.51 | +4.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.41 | 3.40 | +4.01 |
Drawdowns
PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PR1T.L drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum BB3M.L drawdown of -1.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1T.L and BB3M.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PR1T.L | BB3M.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -1.19% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.06% | -0.14% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -0.23% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.56% | -1.19% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.03% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.04% | -0.03% |
Volatility
PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) is 0.09%, while JPM BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD Acc USD (BB3M.L) has a volatility of 0.30%. This indicates that PR1T.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BB3M.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PR1T.L | BB3M.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 0.30% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.21% | 0.63% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30% | 0.82% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.39% | 0.99% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 0.96% | -0.58% |
PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PR1T.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BB3M.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PR1T.L vs. BB3M.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PR1T.L nor BB3M.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PR1T.L and BB3M.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PR1T.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1T.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BB3M.L.
PR1T.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while BB3M.L is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1T.L and 0.07% for BB3M.L.
Find the right allocation for PR1T.L and BB3M.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer