PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) and Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PR1J.DE having a 15.82% return and LYY4.DE slightly lower at 15.21%.


PR1J.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.47%
YTD
15.82%
6M
16.06%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*

LYY4.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.08%
YTD
15.21%
6M
15.56%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
15.82%12.92%13.38%16.35%-11.58%10.23%5.13%13.63%
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
15.21%13.10%12.42%14.70%-10.26%8.20%3.15%12.35%

Correlation

The correlation between PR1J.DE and LYY4.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.98

The correlation between PR1J.DE and LYY4.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR1J.DE
PR1J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

LYY4.DE
LYY4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) and Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PR1J.DELYY4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.95

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

9.67

-0.45

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR1J.DE and LYY4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PR1J.DELYY4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.59

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.25

+0.33

Drawdowns

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR1J.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, smaller than the maximum LYY4.DE drawdown of -54.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1J.DE and LYY4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PR1J.DELYY4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

-54.07%

+25.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-9.61%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.24%

-15.82%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-19.34%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.17%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-14.30%

+8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.93%

+0.24%

Volatility

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) at 3.04%. This indicates that PR1J.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYY4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PR1J.DELYY4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.04%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

14.29%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

17.82%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

16.25%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

16.33%

+1.08%

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PR1J.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than LYY4.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PR1J.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Dividend Comparison

PR1J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than LYY4.DE's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.62%0.71%0.74%1.24%1.88%1.34%1.14%1.94%1.86%1.44%1.98%1.80%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.51%1.75%1.91%1.90%2.21%1.79%1.73%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PR1J.DE and LYY4.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap, while LYY4.DE tracks TOPIX®. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1J.DE and 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR1J.DE and LYY4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer