PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR1J.DE achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than 36B4.DE's 3.58% return.


PR1J.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.47%
YTD
15.82%
6M
16.06%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*

36B4.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.36%
YTD
3.58%
6M
3.67%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
15.82%12.92%13.38%16.35%-11.58%10.23%5.13%13.63%
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
3.58%6.51%9.11%9.64%-13.87%9.91%6.29%18.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PR1J.DE and 36B4.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.95

The correlation between PR1J.DE and 36B4.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR1J.DE
PR1J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

36B4.DE
36B4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PR1J.DE36B4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.11

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

0.90

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

2.55

+6.67

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the 36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR1J.DE and 36B4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PR1J.DE36B4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

0.54

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.25

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.36

+0.22

Drawdowns

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR1J.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, roughly equal to the maximum 36B4.DE drawdown of -26.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR1J.DE and 36B4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PR1J.DE36B4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

-26.99%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-10.89%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.24%

-15.74%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-21.45%

+2.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-1.83%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-7.17%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.88%

-0.71%

Volatility

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) is 3.43%, while iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that PR1J.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 36B4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PR1J.DE36B4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.69%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

14.00%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

18.16%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

16.26%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

17.24%

+0.17%

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PR1J.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than 36B4.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PR1J.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Dividend Comparison

PR1J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than 36B4.DE's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.41%1.46%1.38%1.81%2.44%1.54%1.61%0.81%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.51%1.75%1.91%1.90%2.21%1.79%1.73%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


PR1J.DE and 36B4.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 36B4.DE.

PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap, while 36B4.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PR1J.DE and 0.20% for 36B4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR1J.DE and 36B4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer