PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE
PR1C.DE (Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)) and XLIQ.DE (Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - PR1C.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond while XLIQ.DE tracks the iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PR1C.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLIQ.DE.
Performance
PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PR1C.DE
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- —
XLIQ.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR1C.DE Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) | 0.63% | 3.02% | 4.32% | 7.43% | -13.89% | -1.11% | 2.40% | 4.83% |
XLIQ.DE Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF | 0.27% | 1.87% | 2.30% | 6.61% | -18.10% | -3.39% | 2.42% | 4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PR1C.DE and XLIQ.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, PR1C.DE and XLIQ.DE have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PR1C.DE
XLIQ.DE
PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (PR1C.DE) and Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF (XLIQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PR1C.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PR1C.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PR1C.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility
PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PR1C.DE | XLIQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.43% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.08% | — | — |
PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PR1C.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLIQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PR1C.DE vs. XLIQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
PR1C.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while XLIQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR1C.DE Amundi EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) | 2.54% | 2.55% | 2.19% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.32% | 1.38% | 1.01% |
XLIQ.DE Xtrackers iBoxx EUR Liquid Covered Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PR1C.DE and XLIQ.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PR1C.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLIQ.DE.
PR1C.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond, while XLIQ.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Liquid Covered Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PR1C.DE and 0.20% for XLIQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for PR1C.DE and XLIQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer