PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQVM.L vs. I500.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PQVM.L is traded in USD, while I500.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the I500.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQVM.L achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than I500.L's 10.34% return.


PQVM.L

1D
0.39%
1M
4.36%
YTD
16.65%
6M
17.79%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
24.37%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*

I500.L

1D
0.10%
1M
4.62%
YTD
10.34%
6M
11.34%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PQVM.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
16.65%13.66%30.17%6.82%0.52%26.13%7.41%
I500.L
iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF
10.34%17.82%25.44%26.37%-18.49%30.04%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PQVM.L and I500.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.76

The correlation between PQVM.L and I500.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PQVM.L
I500.L

Technology

25.6%
35.6%

Financial Services

22.0%
11.8%

Industrials

13.7%
8.3%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.5%

Communication Services

9.1%
11.2%

Energy

5.6%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
10.1%

Utilities

2.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

PQVM.L
25.6%
I500.L
35.6%

Financial Services

PQVM.L
22.0%
I500.L
11.8%

Industrials

PQVM.L
13.7%
I500.L
8.3%

Healthcare

PQVM.L
9.4%
I500.L
8.5%

Communication Services

PQVM.L
9.1%
I500.L
11.2%

Energy

PQVM.L
5.6%
I500.L
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

PQVM.L
5.5%
I500.L
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PQVM.L
4.2%
I500.L
10.1%

Utilities

PQVM.L
2.8%
I500.L
2.4%

Basic Materials

PQVM.L
2.2%
I500.L
1.8%

Real Estate

PQVM.L

-

I500.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQVM.L vs. I500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQVM.L
PQVM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

I500.L
I500.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
I500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
I500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
I500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
I500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
I500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQVM.LI500.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

3.23

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.26

13.99

+2.27

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the I500.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQVM.L and I500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQVM.LI500.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.55

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.90

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.10

-0.23

Drawdowns

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQVM.L drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, which is greater than I500.L's maximum drawdown of -25.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVM.L and I500.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQVM.LI500.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.42%

-25.00%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-8.66%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-18.47%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.35%

-25.00%

+7.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.55%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-5.01%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.00%

-0.60%

Volatility

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that PQVM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than I500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQVM.LI500.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.57%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

7.89%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

10.98%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

15.51%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

15.51%

+1.62%

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQVM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than I500.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQVM.L vs. I500.L - Dividend Comparison

PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while I500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
I500.L
iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PQVM.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.77%0.82%0.84%1.58%1.79%0.89%1.48%1.38%1.68%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQVM.L and I500.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.

PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index, while I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PQVM.L and 0.07% for I500.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQVM.L and I500.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer