PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PQVG.L is traded in GBp, while XS2D.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XS2D.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQVG.L achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.14% return.


PQVG.L

1D
-3.17%
1M
-4.70%
6M
12.49%
YTD
14.32%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*

XS2D.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.25%
6M
16.31%
YTD
17.14%
1Y
37.73%
3Y*
32.04%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
23.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
14.32%5.84%32.29%0.98%12.54%27.78%4.44%21.16%-1.98%-10.66%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.14%17.56%48.20%41.43%-31.85%64.57%17.41%56.67%-10.94%23.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PQVG.L and XS2D.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between PQVG.L and XS2D.L has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PQVG.L
XS2D.L

Technology

31.0%
56.8%

Industrials

21.2%
5.9%

Financial Services

13.0%
6.0%

Energy

12.1%

-

Communication Services

5.3%
6.6%

Healthcare

5.2%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
9.3%

Basic Materials

4.3%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
0.0%

Utilities

0.3%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.4%

Technology

PQVG.L
31.0%
XS2D.L
56.8%

Industrials

PQVG.L
21.2%
XS2D.L
5.9%

Financial Services

PQVG.L
13.0%
XS2D.L
6.0%

Energy

PQVG.L
12.1%
XS2D.L

-

Communication Services

PQVG.L
5.3%
XS2D.L
6.6%

Healthcare

PQVG.L
5.2%
XS2D.L
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PQVG.L
5.1%
XS2D.L
9.3%

Basic Materials

PQVG.L
4.3%
XS2D.L
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

PQVG.L
2.2%
XS2D.L
0.0%

Utilities

PQVG.L
0.3%
XS2D.L
4.9%

Real Estate

PQVG.L
0.2%
XS2D.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQVG.L
PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQVG.LXS2D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.38

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

8.62

+3.48

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQVG.L and XS2D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, smaller than the maximum XS2D.L drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVG.L and XS2D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQVG.LXS2D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.88%

-54.44%

+28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-15.77%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

-36.46%

+19.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.44%

-37.20%

+19.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-2.41%

-4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-8.12%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

4.36%

-2.68%

Volatility

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) at 5.47%. This indicates that PQVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQVG.LXS2D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

5.47%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

17.88%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

23.63%

-10.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

30.26%

-15.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

31.29%

-13.30%

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQVG.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while XS2D.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.83%0.83%0.82%1.61%1.77%0.88%1.59%1.41%1.30%0.72%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQVG.L and XS2D.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PQVG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PQVG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.

PQVG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return), while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PQVG.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQVG.L and XS2D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer