PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PQVG.L is traded in GBp, while WMVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WMVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQVG.L achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than WMVG.L's 1.31% return.


PQVG.L

1D
0.36%
1M
5.36%
YTD
16.79%
6M
17.07%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*

WMVG.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.16%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.93%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
16.79%5.84%32.29%0.98%12.54%27.78%4.44%14.67%
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
1.31%9.08%14.49%7.33%-8.31%16.96%-1.30%11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PQVG.L and WMVG.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.57

The correlation between PQVG.L and WMVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PQVG.L
WMVG.L

Technology

24.3%
20.1%

Financial Services

21.8%
14.0%

Industrials

15.6%
9.2%

Communication Services

10.4%
12.1%

Healthcare

9.5%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
10.9%

Energy

5.6%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
5.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.1%

Utilities

0.8%
8.0%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

PQVG.L
24.3%
WMVG.L
20.1%

Financial Services

PQVG.L
21.8%
WMVG.L
14.0%

Industrials

PQVG.L
15.6%
WMVG.L
9.2%

Communication Services

PQVG.L
10.4%
WMVG.L
12.1%

Healthcare

PQVG.L
9.5%
WMVG.L
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

PQVG.L
5.6%
WMVG.L
10.9%

Energy

PQVG.L
5.6%
WMVG.L
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PQVG.L
4.3%
WMVG.L
5.6%

Basic Materials

PQVG.L
2.2%
WMVG.L
1.1%

Utilities

PQVG.L
0.8%
WMVG.L
8.0%

Real Estate

PQVG.L

-

WMVG.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQVG.L
PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

WMVG.L
WMVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQVG.LWMVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.07

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.82

0.56

+5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.49

1.40

+16.09

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQVG.L and WMVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQVG.LWMVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

0.39

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.62

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.55

+0.34

Drawdowns

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, smaller than the maximum WMVG.L drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVG.L and WMVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQVG.LWMVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.88%

-28.25%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.11%

-4.99%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

-9.09%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.44%

-15.18%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.21%

+3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-4.12%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

2.01%

-0.64%

Volatility

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) at 2.13%. This indicates that PQVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQVG.LWMVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.13%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

5.03%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

7.21%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

9.95%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

12.14%

+4.10%

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PQVG.L and WMVG.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

PQVG.L vs. WMVG.L - Dividend Comparison

PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while WMVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.77%0.82%0.82%1.61%1.77%0.87%1.59%1.41%1.30%0.72%
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQVG.L and WMVG.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PQVG.L and WMVG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

PQVG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while WMVG.L is Global Equities. PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return), while WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQVG.L and WMVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer