PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) and SPEP.L (Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco - PQVG.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return) while SPEP.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PQVG.L returned 16.07%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for SPEP.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQVG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPEP.L.

Performance

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQVG.L achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than SPEP.L's 11.15% return.

PQVG.L

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 20.24%
• 6M: 20.54%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 23.22%
• 5Y*: 16.07%
• 10Y*: —

SPEP.L

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 31.62%
• 3Y*: 19.51%
• 5Y*: 15.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	20.24%	5.84%	32.29%	0.98%	12.54%	27.78%	18.80%
SPEP.L Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc	11.15%	9.94%	26.61%	21.47%	-8.35%	34.02%	21.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PQVG.L and SPEP.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2020	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between PQVG.L and SPEP.L has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PQVG.L	SPEP.L
Technology	26.5%	38.0%
Financial Services	21.6%	12.3%
Industrials	16.4%	8.2%
Healthcare	9.1%	10.6%
Communication Services	9.1%	12.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	5.1%
Energy	5.1%	2.7%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	5.0%
Basic Materials	2.0%	2.0%
Utilities	0.7%	1.4%
Real Estate	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQVG.L

PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SPEP.L

SPEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SPEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SPEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SPEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SPEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PQVG.L	SPEP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.89	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	3.97	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.53	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.93	4.54	+2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.22	17.52	+3.70

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQVG.L and SPEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, which is greater than SPEP.L's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVG.L and SPEP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQVG.L	SPEP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.88%	-21.07%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.11%	-6.93%	+2.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.44%	-21.07%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.44%	-21.07%	+3.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-0.52%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-4.49%	-1.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	1.80%	-0.46%

Volatility

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) at 3.52%. This indicates that PQVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQVG.L	SPEP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	3.52%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.55%	7.58%	+0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	10.91%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	20.10%	-5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	20.80%	-2.89%

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEP.L's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQVG.L vs. SPEP.L - Dividend Comparison

PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while SPEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.79%	0.83%	0.82%	1.61%	1.77%	0.88%	1.59%	1.41%	1.30%	0.72%
SPEP.L Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQVG.L and SPEP.L in my portfolio?

PQVG.L and SPEP.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PQVG.L or SPEP.L?

On fees, SPEP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PQVG.L or SPEP.L?

SPEP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

What is the main difference between PQVG.L and SPEP.L?

PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return), while SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PQVG.L and 0.09% for SPEP.L.