PQVG.L vs. I500.L
PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) and I500.L (iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - PQVG.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return) while I500.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PQVG.L returned 16.68%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for I500.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQVG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for I500.L.
Performance
PQVG.L vs. I500.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PQVG.L is traded in GBp, while I500.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the I500.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQVG.L achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than I500.L's 10.61% return.
PQVG.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- —
I500.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- —
PQVG.L vs. I500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.79% | 5.84% | 32.29% | 0.98% | 12.54% | 27.78% | 1.15% |
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 10.61% | 9.56% | 27.57% | 20.04% | -8.74% | 31.23% | 5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQVG.L and I500.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PQVG.L and I500.L has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PQVG.L vs. I500.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PQVG.L
I500.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
PQVG.L
I500.L
Financial Services
PQVG.L
I500.L
Industrials
PQVG.L
I500.L
Communication Services
PQVG.L
I500.L
Healthcare
PQVG.L
I500.L
Consumer Defensive
PQVG.L
I500.L
Energy
PQVG.L
I500.L
Consumer Cyclical
PQVG.L
I500.L
Basic Materials
PQVG.L
I500.L
Utilities
PQVG.L
I500.L
Real Estate
PQVG.L
-
I500.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQVG.L vs. I500.L — Risk / Return Rank
PQVG.L
I500.L
PQVG.L vs. I500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQVG.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.52 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.82 | 4.13 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.49 | 15.23 | +2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQVG.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.81 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.13 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
PQVG.L vs. I500.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, which is greater than I500.L's maximum drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVG.L and I500.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQVG.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -20.75% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -7.08% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -20.75% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.44% | -20.75% | +3.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -3.35% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 1.92% | -0.55% |
Volatility
PQVG.L vs. I500.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) at 2.59%. This indicates that PQVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than I500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQVG.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.59% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 7.12% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 10.40% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 14.21% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 14.30% | +1.94% |
PQVG.L vs. I500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than I500.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQVG.L vs. I500.L - Dividend Comparison
PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while I500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.30% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQVG.L and I500.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.
PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return), while I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PQVG.L and 0.07% for I500.L.
Find the right allocation for PQVG.L and I500.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer