PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L
PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PQVG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return), while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PQVG.L returned 16.59%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for EQQQ.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQVG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.
Performance
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQVG.L achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 20.61% return.
PQVG.L
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.32%
- 1Y
- 23.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- —
EQQQ.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 20.61%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 42.65%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 22.67%
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.37% | 5.84% | 32.29% | 0.98% | 12.54% | 27.78% | 4.44% | 21.16% | -1.98% | 14.30% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 20.61% | 11.54% | 28.55% | 47.79% | -25.54% | 29.59% | 43.32% | 33.69% | 4.64% | 9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQVG.L and EQQQ.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PQVG.L and EQQQ.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Financial Services
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Industrials
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Communication Services
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Healthcare
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Consumer Defensive
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Energy
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Basic Materials
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Utilities
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
Real Estate
PQVG.L
-
EQQQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
PQVG.L
EQQQ.L
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQVG.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.51 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.78 | 3.87 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.38 | 11.41 | +5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQVG.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.89 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.99 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.92 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQVG.L and EQQQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQVG.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -33.75% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -10.97% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.44% | -24.09% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.44% | -27.76% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -5.61% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 3.73% | -2.36% |
Volatility
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) is 2.80%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that PQVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQVG.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 4.09% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 10.30% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 14.76% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 19.14% | -4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 19.35% | -3.10% |
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQVG.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than EQQQ.L's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% |
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.78% | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.30% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQVG.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.
PQVG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return), while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PQVG.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
Find the right allocation for PQVG.L and EQQQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer