PQTPX vs. RYMTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PQTPX (PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and RYMTX (Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 10 years, PQTPX returned 4.30%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for RYMTX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PQTPX charges 1.51%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for RYMTX.

Performance

PQTPX vs. RYMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQTPX achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than RYMTX's 8.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PQTPX has outperformed RYMTX with an annualized return of 4.30%, while RYMTX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return.

PQTPX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 20.99%
• 3Y*: 0.66%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: 4.30%

RYMTX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 4.57%
• 5Y*: 5.91%
• 10Y*: 3.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQTPX vs. RYMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund	6.40%	2.41%	-3.08%	-4.21%	11.37%	14.83%	9.72%	2.83%	2.30%	2.21%
RYMTX Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund	8.95%	5.52%	0.56%	3.62%	14.75%	2.62%	2.07%	7.18%	-7.87%	7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTPX and RYMTX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.56

The correlation between PQTPX and RYMTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PQTPX vs. RYMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQTPX

PQTPX Risk / Return Rank: 71
PQTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PQTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PQTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PQTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PQTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

RYMTX

RYMTX Risk / Return Rank: 53
RYMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RYMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RYMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RYMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RYMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQTPX vs. RYMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PQTPX	RYMTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.78	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.45	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.34	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	3.64	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	13.88	-1.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PQTPX vs. RYMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the RYMTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTPX and RYMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PQTPX	RYMTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.78	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.49	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.35	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.10	+0.38

Drawdowns

PQTPX vs. RYMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTPX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, smaller than the maximum RYMTX drawdown of -34.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTPX and RYMTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQTPX	RYMTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.86%	-34.19%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.66%	-5.43%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.69%	-17.54%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.86%	-17.54%	-10.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.86%	-17.54%	-10.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.20%	-1.02%	-10.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-18.90%	+9.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	1.42%	+0.22%

Volatility

PQTPX vs. RYMTX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) at 1.72%. This indicates that PQTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQTPX	RYMTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	1.72%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.65%	8.46%	-1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.46%	11.10%	-2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.91%	12.15%	-2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.38%	10.65%	-1.27%

PQTPX vs. RYMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTPX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMTX's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQTPX vs. RYMTX - Dividend Comparison

PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.80%	2.40%	5.63%	2.49%	0.32%	0.20%	0.00%	7.57%
RYMTX Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund	5.53%	6.03%	5.10%	1.02%	4.80%	0.00%	7.56%	0.00%	0.00%	4.70%	5.19%	2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQTPX and RYMTX in my portfolio?

PQTPX and RYMTX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQTPX or RYMTX?

PQTPX has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to RYMTX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTPX dropped -27.86% vs RYMTX's -34.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.