PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQTPX vs. PFORX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQTPX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQTPX achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PQTPX has outperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 4.30%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.90% annualized return.


PQTPX

1D
0.36%
1M
1.62%
YTD
6.40%
6M
8.65%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
0.66%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
4.30%

PFORX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.28%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.26%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQTPX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQTPX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund
6.40%2.41%-3.08%-4.21%11.37%14.83%9.72%2.83%2.30%2.21%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
0.12%4.33%5.70%9.52%-10.33%-1.67%6.17%7.64%2.64%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTPX and PFORX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.05

The correlation between PQTPX and PFORX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (5 years) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQTPX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQTPX
PQTPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PQTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PFORX
PFORX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PFORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFORX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PFORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFORX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQTPX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQTPXPFORXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.16

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

0.76

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

2.32

+10.42

PQTPX vs. PFORX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the PFORX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTPX and PFORX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQTPXPFORXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

0.80

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.44

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.92

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.26

-0.79

Drawdowns

PQTPX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTPX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTPX and PFORX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQTPXPFORXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.86%

-13.87%

-13.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

-3.99%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-3.99%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.86%

-13.71%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.86%

-13.87%

-13.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.20%

-1.37%

-9.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-1.95%

-7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.30%

+0.34%

Volatility

PQTPX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.47%. This indicates that PQTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQTPXPFORXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

1.47%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

3.38%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.46%

3.78%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

3.61%

+6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.38%

3.16%

+6.22%

PQTPX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTPX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQTPX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison

PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
4.10%4.23%4.91%3.02%3.65%1.55%2.46%6.86%2.90%1.46%1.38%9.12%
PQTPX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.80%2.40%5.63%2.49%0.32%0.20%0.00%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQTPX and PFORX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQTPX has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to PFORX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTPX dropped -27.86% vs PFORX's -13.87%.

PQTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQTPX and PFORX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer