PQTPX vs. ASFYX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX).
PQTPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013. ASFYX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Performance
PQTPX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQTPX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 4.61% | 2.41% | -3.08% | -4.21% | 11.37% | 14.83% | 9.72% | 2.83% | 2.30% | 2.21% |
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y | 6.59% | -9.67% | -3.22% | -10.33% | 35.67% | 3.52% | 13.59% | 8.99% | -12.59% | 6.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQTPX achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PQTPX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 3.75%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.87% annualized return.
PQTPX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
ASFYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- -2.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQTPX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQTPX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQTPX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank
PQTPX
ASFYX
PQTPX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQTPX | ASFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.18 | +1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 0.30 | +1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.04 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.10 | +1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 0.16 | +3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQTPX | ASFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.18 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.17 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.15 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.31 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQTPX and ASFYX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PQTPX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison
PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.80% | 2.40% | 5.63% | 2.49% | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 7.57% |
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y | 1.43% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 0.99% | 32.48% | 6.07% | 3.40% | 5.51% | 1.30% | 0.07% | 0.01% | 5.06% |
Drawdowns
PQTPX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQTPX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, smaller than the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTPX and ASFYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQTPX | ASFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -36.43% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -13.51% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.86% | -36.43% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.86% | -36.43% | +8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -24.37% | +11.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -13.09% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 8.72% | -5.42% |
Volatility
PQTPX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) is 3.61%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that PQTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQTPX | ASFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.86% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 10.01% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.73% | 13.02% | -4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.86% | 13.68% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.36% | 12.68% | -3.32% |