PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQTAX vs. RYMTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQTAX vs. RYMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQTAX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than RYMTX's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PQTAX has outperformed RYMTX with an annualized return of 3.54%, while RYMTX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.07% annualized return.


PQTAX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.96%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
2.33%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
-0.02%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
3.54%
ALL TIME*
3.96%

RYMTX

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.48%
6M
0.58%
YTD
5.49%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
3.07%
ALL TIME*
0.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PQTAX vs. RYMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
2.33%2.06%-3.31%-4.52%11.06%14.52%8.48%2.63%1.98%4.51%
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.49%5.52%0.56%3.62%14.75%2.62%2.07%7.18%-7.87%7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTAX and RYMTX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.56

The correlation between PQTAX and RYMTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQTAX vs. RYMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PQTAX
PQTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PQTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

RYMTX
RYMTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RYMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PQTAX vs. RYMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PQTAXRYMTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.73

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

7.87

-0.65

PQTAX vs. RYMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the RYMTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTAX and RYMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PQTAX vs. RYMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTAX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum RYMTX drawdown of -34.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTAX and RYMTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQTAXRYMTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-34.19%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

-5.43%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-17.54%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.39%

-17.54%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.39%

-17.54%

-10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.45%

-4.16%

-11.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-18.76%

+9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.88%

+0.02%

Volatility

PQTAX vs. RYMTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) is 2.08%, while Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that PQTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQTAXRYMTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

2.34%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.67%

8.05%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69%

11.47%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.94%

12.04%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.34%

10.65%

-1.31%

PQTAX vs. RYMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTAX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is higher than RYMTX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQTAX vs. RYMTX - Dividend Comparison

PQTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than RYMTX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.61%2.22%4.46%2.29%0.10%2.54%0.00%7.65%
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.72%6.03%5.10%1.02%4.80%0.00%7.56%0.00%0.00%4.70%5.19%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PQTAX and RYMTX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYMTX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to PQTAX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTAX dropped -28.39% vs RYMTX's -34.19%.

PQTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQTAX and RYMTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer