PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PQTAX vs. PQTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PQTAX vs. PQTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PQTAX having a 6.24% return and PQTPX slightly higher at 6.40%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PQTAX having a 4.17% annualized return and PQTPX not far ahead at 4.30%.


PQTAX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.56%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.42%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
0.33%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
4.17%

PQTPX

1D
0.36%
1M
1.62%
YTD
6.40%
6M
8.65%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
0.66%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQTAX vs. PQTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
6.24%2.06%-3.31%-4.52%11.06%14.52%8.48%2.63%1.98%4.51%
PQTPX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund
6.40%2.41%-3.08%-4.21%11.37%14.83%9.72%2.83%2.30%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PQTAX and PQTPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.99

The correlation between PQTAX and PQTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PQTAX vs. PQTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQTAX
PQTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PQTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PQTPX
PQTPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PQTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQTAX vs. PQTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PQTAXPQTPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

4.49

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

12.74

-0.39

PQTAX vs. PQTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the PQTPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQTAX and PQTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PQTAXPQTPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.47

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.38

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.46

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Drawdowns

PQTAX vs. PQTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQTAX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, roughly equal to the maximum PQTPX drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQTAX and PQTPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PQTAXPQTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-27.86%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.66%

-4.66%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-18.69%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.39%

-27.86%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.39%

-27.86%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.22%

-11.20%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-9.41%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.64%

0.00%

Volatility

PQTAX vs. PQTPX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) have volatilities of 1.85% and 1.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PQTAXPQTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

1.93%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.60%

6.65%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.49%

8.46%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.93%

9.91%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.44%

9.38%

+0.06%

PQTAX vs. PQTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQTAX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is higher than PQTPX's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

PQTAX vs. PQTPX - Dividend Comparison

Neither PQTAX nor PQTPX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.61%2.22%4.46%2.29%0.10%2.54%0.00%7.65%
PQTPX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.80%2.40%5.63%2.49%0.32%0.20%0.00%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PQTAX and PQTPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PQTPX has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to PQTAX (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQTAX dropped -28.39% vs PQTPX's -27.86%.

PQTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PQTAX and PQTPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer