PQOC vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PQOC (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PQOC returned 20.55% vs 21.47% for PQAP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

PQOC vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October (PQOC) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQOC achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.

PQOC

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 20.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQOC vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PQOC PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October	9.01%	14.67%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	12.09%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PQOC and PQAP is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.92

The correlation between PQOC and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PQOC vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQOC

PQOC Risk / Return Rank: 73
PQOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PQOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
PQOC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PQOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PQOC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQOC vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October (PQOC) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PQOC	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	4.86	-2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	8.47	-5.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	2.20	-0.73
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	15.50	-12.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.07	86.25	-72.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PQOC vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQOC and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PQOC	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	4.86	-2.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	1.76	-0.43

Drawdowns

PQOC vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQOC drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQOC and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQOC	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.71%	-10.79%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.68%	-1.39%	-5.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.12%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-0.60%	-1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	0.25%	+1.21%

Volatility

PQOC vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October (PQOC) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) at 1.02%. This indicates that PQOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQOC	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	1.02%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.76%	3.09%	+3.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.60%	4.45%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.94%	11.03%	+1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.94%	11.03%	+1.91%

PQOC vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PQOC and PQAP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

PQOC vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

PQOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%
PQOC PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQOC and PQAP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, PQOC and PQAP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PQOC or PQAP?

PQOC has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to PQAP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQOC dropped -13.71% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, PQOC or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 21.47% vs 20.55% for PQOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PQOC or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 20.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PQOC or PQAP?

PQOC and PQAP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PQOC or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for PQOC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.