PQJL vs. KFEB

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

PQJL (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - July) and KFEB (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PQJL returned 13.35% vs 24.87% for KFEB. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PQJL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KFEB.

Performance

PQJL vs. KFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - July (PQJL) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQJL achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than KFEB's 15.29% return.

PQJL

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 1.15%
• 6M: 6.18%
• YTD: 6.64%
• 1Y: 13.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.43%

KFEB

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 1.36%
• 6M: 8.72%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 1Y: 24.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KFEB Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February	$35.62K	$47.32K	$136.14K
PQJL PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - July	$106.56K	$136.45K	$167.13K

PQJL vs. KFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PQJL PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - July	6.64%	14.43%
KFEB Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February	15.29%	9.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PQJL and KFEB is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025	0.71

The correlation between PQJL and KFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PQJL vs. KFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PQJL

PQJL Risk / Return Rank: 56
PQJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PQJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
PQJL Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PQJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PQJL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

KFEB

KFEB Risk / Return Rank: 89
KFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
KFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
KFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 86
KFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
KFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PQJL vs. KFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - July (PQJL) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PQJL	KFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.33	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	3.38	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	4.31	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	16.04	-6.76

PQJL vs. KFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the KFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQJL and KFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PQJL vs. KFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQJL drawdown since its inception was -12.32%, smaller than the maximum KFEB drawdown of -14.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQJL and KFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQJL	KFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.32%	-14.16%	+1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.13%	-5.80%	-0.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	0.00%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.33%	-2.10%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	1.55%	-0.11%

Volatility

PQJL vs. KFEB - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - July (PQJL) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) at 1.80%. This indicates that PQJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQJL	KFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	1.80%	+3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.67%	7.15%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.22%	10.78%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.95%	12.74%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.95%	12.74%	-0.79%

PQJL vs. KFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQJL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KFEB's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQJL vs. KFEB - Dividend Comparison

PQJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while KFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQJL and KFEB in my portfolio?

PQJL and KFEB have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQJL or KFEB?

PQJL has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to KFEB (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQJL dropped -12.32% vs KFEB's -14.16%.

Which ETF is better, PQJL or KFEB?

On 1-year performance, KFEB leads with 24.87% vs 13.35% for PQJL. On fees, PQJL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PQJL or KFEB?

Over the 1-year period, KFEB has performed better with a 24.87% return vs 13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PQJL or KFEB?

PQJL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PQJL or KFEB?

PQJL has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for KFEB.

What is the main difference between PQJL and KFEB?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PQJL and 0.79% for KFEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.