PQJCX vs. NESGX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQJCX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX).
PQJCX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 15, 2016. NESGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on May 22, 2002.
Performance
PQJCX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQJCX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQJCX PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund | -1.17% | 1.89% | 28.82% | 14.96% | -24.07% | 21.70% | 38.85% | 25.61% | -12.36% | 18.36% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 15.34% | 10.50% | 12.76% | 5.68% | -30.21% | 10.59% | 71.90% | 54.42% | -5.43% | 12.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQJCX achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 15.34% return.
PQJCX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 13.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- —
NESGX
- 1D
- 5.32%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 15.34%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 55.17%
- 3Y*
- 12.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQJCX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQJCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQJCX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank
PQJCX
NESGX
PQJCX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQJCX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQJCX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.58 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 2.17 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.29 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 3.11 | -2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.43 | 10.44 | -7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQJCX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.58 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.04 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQJCX and NESGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PQJCX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison
PQJCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQJCX PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund | 3.05% | 3.01% | 18.27% | 0.83% | 0.51% | 26.55% | 3.86% | 0.00% | 7.11% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.16% | 25.09% | 13.69% | 8.43% | 22.26% | 8.94% | 6.67% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
PQJCX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQJCX drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum NESGX drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQJCX and NESGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQJCX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -50.29% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -17.27% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -50.05% | +13.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.81% | -4.31% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -11.74% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 5.14% | -1.28% |
Volatility
PQJCX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Small-Cap Core Equity Fund (PQJCX) is 7.86%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a volatility of 12.14%. This indicates that PQJCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQJCX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 12.14% | -4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 23.43% | -10.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.19% | 35.37% | -13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 29.13% | -7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 25.56% | -2.56% |