PQIPX vs. GBMFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PQIPX (PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund) and GBMFX (GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, PQIPX returned 8.03%/yr vs 6.93%/yr for GBMFX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PQIPX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for GBMFX.

Performance

PQIPX vs. GBMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund (PQIPX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PQIPX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than GBMFX's 11.97% return. Over the past 10 years, PQIPX has outperformed GBMFX with an annualized return of 8.03%, while GBMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.93% annualized return.

PQIPX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 18.33%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 7.25%
• 10Y*: 8.03%

GBMFX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 28.78%
• 3Y*: 16.57%
• 5Y*: 8.54%
• 10Y*: 6.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PQIPX vs. GBMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQIPX PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund	7.76%	17.26%	7.08%	11.93%	-6.37%	18.45%	-1.54%	15.53%	-8.78%	16.08%
GBMFX GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund	11.97%	22.89%	4.33%	13.46%	-2.24%	2.97%	-2.50%	11.62%	-5.36%	13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PQIPX and GBMFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011	0.81

The correlation between PQIPX and GBMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PQIPX vs. GBMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PQIPX

PQIPX Risk / Return Rank: 84
PQIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PQIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PQIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PQIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PQIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

GBMFX

GBMFX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GBMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GBMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GBMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GBMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GBMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PQIPX vs. GBMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund (PQIPX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PQIPX	GBMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	4.11	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	5.92	-1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.83	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	5.04	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.30	19.35	-4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PQIPX vs. GBMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PQIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the GBMFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PQIPX and GBMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PQIPX	GBMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	4.11	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	1.18	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.87	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.99	-0.36

Drawdowns

PQIPX vs. GBMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PQIPX drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than GBMFX's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQIPX and GBMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PQIPX	GBMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-23.40%	-9.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.06%	-5.78%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.69%	-7.16%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.81%	-14.42%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.13%	-23.40%	-9.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	0.00%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-3.27%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	1.50%	-0.28%

Volatility

PQIPX vs. GBMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund (PQIPX) is 2.04%, while GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) has a volatility of 2.36%. This indicates that PQIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PQIPX	GBMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	2.36%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.19%	5.47%	-0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.37%	7.08%	-0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.60%	7.30%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.14%	8.00%	+4.14%

PQIPX vs. GBMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PQIPX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than GBMFX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

PQIPX vs. GBMFX - Dividend Comparison

PQIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than GBMFX's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GBMFX GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund	3.72%	4.16%	5.14%	5.64%	3.20%	2.46%	3.73%	3.35%	3.67%	2.39%	1.60%	2.10%
PQIPX PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund	2.78%	2.05%	3.02%	4.35%	5.51%	3.96%	2.69%	3.79%	3.73%	2.69%	3.46%	11.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PQIPX and GBMFX in my portfolio?

PQIPX and GBMFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PQIPX or GBMFX?

GBMFX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to PQIPX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQIPX dropped -33.13% vs GBMFX's -23.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.