PQEMX vs. GMAQX
PQEMX (PGIM Quant Solutions Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and GMAQX (GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, PQEMX returned 29.10%/yr vs 33.03%/yr for GMAQX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PQEMX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for GMAQX.
Performance
PQEMX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQEMX achieves a 33.04% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 53.39% return.
PQEMX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 8.78%
- YTD
- 33.04%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 61.61%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- —
GMAQX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 53.39%
- 6M
- 57.21%
- 1Y
- 84.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PQEMX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQEMX PGIM Quant Solutions Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 33.04% | 35.22% | 10.64% | 13.61% | -16.02% | -2.33% |
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 53.39% | 32.09% | 0.62% | 27.41% | -32.38% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PQEMX and GMAQX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PQEMX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PQEMX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank
PQEMX
GMAQX
PQEMX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PQEMX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PQEMX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.75 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 6.14 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.21 | 21.86 | -3.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PQEMX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, roughly equal to the maximum GMAQX drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQEMX and GMAQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQEMX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.90% | -41.97% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.17% | -13.77% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -19.64% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.89% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -16.60% | +4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 3.86% | -0.45% |
Volatility
PQEMX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Quant Solutions Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PQEMX) is 10.66%, while GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that PQEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PQEMX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 11.46% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.18% | 20.95% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 22.97% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 17.70% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 17.70% | -0.16% |
PQEMX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQEMX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
PQEMX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison
PQEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, more than GMAQX's 6.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 6.15% | 9.43% | 32.28% | 6.76% | 4.94% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQEMX PGIM Quant Solutions Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 14.18% | 18.87% | 2.76% | 3.40% | 4.08% | 3.41% | 1.39% | 2.06% | 3.04% | 6.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PQEMX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMAQX has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to PQEMX (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PQEMX dropped -39.90% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.
GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PQEMX and GMAQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer