PQCMX vs. PDBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX).
PQCMX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Nov 14, 2016. PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997.
Performance
PQCMX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PQCMX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund | 26.66% | 13.62% | 5.09% | -8.67% | 19.10% | 27.81% | -1.13% | 8.78% | -12.07% | 2.96% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.53% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PQCMX achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's -0.53% return.
PQCMX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 12.26%
- YTD
- 26.66%
- 6M
- 32.84%
- 1Y
- 32.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.09%
- 10Y*
- —
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PQCMX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PQCMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PQCMX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
PQCMX
PDBZX
PQCMX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PQCMX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 1.04 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 1.48 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.18 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 1.75 | +1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 5.12 | +4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PQCMX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.04 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.17 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.09 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between PQCMX and PDBZX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PQCMX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
PQCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than PDBZX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund | 6.38% | 8.09% | 4.14% | 3.93% | 31.36% | 47.61% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 3.02% | 1.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.19% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
PQCMX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PQCMX drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PQCMX and PDBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PQCMX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.00% | -20.88% | -12.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -3.06% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.78% | -20.81% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.52% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -2.31% | -9.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 1.05% | +2.45% |
Volatility
PQCMX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 1.72%. This indicates that PQCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PQCMX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 1.72% | +6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 2.71% | +11.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.23% | 4.59% | +12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 6.00% | +10.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 5.34% | +9.76% |