PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPYPX vs. QFVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPYPX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPYPX achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 18.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PPYPX has underperformed QFVOX with an annualized return of 9.24%, while QFVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.78% annualized return.


PPYPX

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
10.21%
6M
6.05%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
9.24%

QFVOX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.01%
YTD
18.86%
6M
19.99%
1Y
39.02%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPYPX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPYPX
PIMCO RAE International Fund
10.21%31.34%-1.15%18.13%-8.73%10.68%2.05%16.43%-15.49%24.89%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
18.86%33.85%-0.70%19.88%-17.14%19.44%2.65%17.93%-13.28%25.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PPYPX and QFVOX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PPYPX and QFVOX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPYPX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPYPX
PPYPX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PPYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PPYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

QFVOX
QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPYPX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPYPXQFVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.49

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.53

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

12.33

-1.74

PPYPX vs. QFVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPYPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the QFVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPYPX and QFVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPYPX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPYPX drawdown since its inception was -42.48%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPYPX and QFVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPYPXQFVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.48%

-70.51%

+28.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-11.02%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.00%

-14.92%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.65%

-32.90%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.48%

-45.52%

+3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-0.50%

-4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-15.27%

+5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.14%

-0.82%

Volatility

PPYPX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) is 3.21%, while Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that PPYPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPYPXQFVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

4.48%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

13.10%

-2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

15.10%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.54%

15.55%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

16.75%

+2.21%

PPYPX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPYPX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPYPX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison

PPYPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than QFVOX's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPYPX
PIMCO RAE International Fund
7.06%7.78%6.57%10.09%7.20%27.06%2.23%4.20%5.96%2.53%2.41%0.00%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
4.76%5.66%1.95%1.88%1.43%10.11%1.58%1.14%0.98%0.60%1.02%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPYPX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QFVOX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to PPYPX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPYPX dropped -42.48% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPYPX and QFVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer