PPTY vs. SRVR
PPTY (US Diversified Real Estate ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both REIT funds - PPTY tracks the USREX - U.S. Diversified Real Estate Index while SRVR tracks the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PPTY returned 2.22%/yr vs -0.31%/yr for SRVR. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPTY charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
PPTY vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPTY achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 21.97% return.
PPTY
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 10.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 21.97%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 13.47%
- 3Y*
- 9.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PPTY vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPTY US Diversified Real Estate ETF | 9.21% | -3.47% | 9.85% | 12.66% | -26.10% | 40.36% | -7.25% | 30.19% | 1.11% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 21.97% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPTY and SRVR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PPTY and SRVR has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PPTY vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PPTY
SRVR
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
PPTY
SRVR
Consumer Cyclical
PPTY
SRVR
-
Financial Services
PPTY
SRVR
Healthcare
PPTY
SRVR
-
Basic Materials
PPTY
-
SRVR
Communication Services
PPTY
-
SRVR
Consumer Defensive
PPTY
-
SRVR
-
Energy
PPTY
-
SRVR
Industrials
PPTY
-
SRVR
Technology
PPTY
-
SRVR
Utilities
PPTY
-
SRVR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPTY vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
PPTY
SRVR
PPTY vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Diversified Real Estate ETF (PPTY) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPTY | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 0.81 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.24 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 0.94 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 2.05 | +1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPTY | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.81 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | -0.02 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
PPTY vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPTY drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, roughly equal to the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPTY and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPTY | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.69% | -40.99% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -14.78% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.06% | -18.34% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.37% | -40.99% | +8.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -10.69% | +6.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -15.27% | +3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 6.82% | -4.02% |
Volatility
PPTY vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Diversified Real Estate ETF (PPTY) is 3.97%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that PPTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPTY | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 5.22% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 13.11% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.63% | 16.62% | -2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 19.69% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 21.44% | +0.48% |
PPTY vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPTY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPTY vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
PPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, which matches SRVR's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPTY US Diversified Real Estate ETF | 2.66% | 3.04% | 3.29% | 4.08% | 4.29% | 2.87% | 3.43% | 3.30% | 1.97% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.66% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPTY and SRVR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to PPTY (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPTY dropped -41.69% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, PPTY leads with 2.22% vs -0.31% for SRVR. On fees, PPTY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PPTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PPTY has performed better with a 2.22% return vs -0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPTY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.
PPTY and SRVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.66%.
PPTY tracks USREX - U.S. Diversified Real Estate Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PPTY and 0.60% for SRVR.
SRVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPTY and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer