PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPTY vs. RWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPTY vs. RWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Diversified Real Estate ETF (PPTY) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPTY achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly lower than RWR's 19.80% return.


PPTY

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.11%
6M
14.60%
YTD
16.67%
1Y
20.67%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.51%

RWR

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.66%
6M
16.61%
YTD
19.80%
1Y
26.30%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
5.04%
ALL TIME*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$217.61K$190.74K$109.18K
$43.72M$37.86M$34.73M

PPTY vs. RWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PPTY
US Diversified Real Estate ETF
16.67%-3.47%9.85%12.66%-26.10%40.36%-7.25%30.19%4.86%
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
19.80%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PPTY and RWR is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.97

The correlation between PPTY and RWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPTY vs. RWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PPTY
PPTY Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PPTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PPTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PPTY vs. RWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Diversified Real Estate ETF (PPTY) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPTYRWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.21

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

11.41

-3.84

PPTY vs. RWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the RWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPTY and RWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPTY vs. RWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPTY drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, smaller than the maximum RWR drawdown of -74.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPTY and RWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPTYRWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.69%

-74.92%

+33.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-8.04%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.06%

-18.85%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.37%

-32.58%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-2.72%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-13.03%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.26%

+0.35%

Volatility

PPTY vs. RWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Diversified Real Estate ETF (PPTY) is 4.35%, while SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that PPTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPTYRWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.99%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

10.99%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

14.14%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

19.05%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.82%

21.57%

+0.25%

PPTY vs. RWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPTY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RWR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPTY vs. RWR - Dividend Comparison

PPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than RWR's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPTY
US Diversified Real Estate ETF
2.46%3.04%3.29%4.08%4.29%2.87%3.43%3.30%1.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.26%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PPTY and RWR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RWR has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to PPTY (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPTY dropped -41.69% vs RWR's -74.92%.

On 5-year performance, RWR leads with 4.74% vs 2.69% for PPTY. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PPTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RWR has performed better with a 4.74% return vs 2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PPTY.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.46% for PPTY.

PPTY tracks USREX - U.S. Diversified Real Estate Index, while RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PPTY and 0.25% for RWR.

RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPTY and RWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer