PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPT vs. PSDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPT vs. PSDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) and Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund (PSDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PPT having a 1.76% return and PSDYX slightly lower at 1.68%. Over the past 10 years, PPT has outperformed PSDYX with an annualized return of 4.42%, while PSDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


PPT

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.40%
6M
-1.47%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
1.45%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
2.75%

PSDYX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.10%
6M
1.31%
YTD
1.68%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
2.53%
ALL TIME*
2.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$415.04K$332.20K$356.46K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PPT vs. PSDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPT
Putnam Premier Income Trust
1.76%8.39%8.80%7.43%-7.75%-1.72%-6.54%25.53%-6.36%13.78%
PSDYX
Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund
1.68%4.99%5.25%4.78%0.61%0.07%1.50%2.86%1.95%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PPT and PSDYX is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.06

The correlation between PPT and PSDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPT vs. PSDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PPT
PPT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

PSDYX
PSDYX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PSDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PSDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PPT vs. PSDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) and Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund (PSDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPTPSDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

3.19

-2.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

7.61

-7.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

37.11

-36.51

PPT vs. PSDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPT Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the PSDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPT and PSDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPT vs. PSDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPT drawdown since its inception was -49.76%, which is greater than PSDYX's maximum drawdown of -2.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPT and PSDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPTPSDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.76%

-2.58%

-47.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.05%

-0.49%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-0.49%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.46%

-0.80%

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

-2.58%

-29.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-0.10%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.20%

-0.07%

-11.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

0.10%

+2.34%

Volatility

PPT vs. PSDYX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund (PSDYX) at 0.17%. This indicates that PPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPTPSDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.17%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

0.93%

+5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.18%

1.36%

+7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.88%

1.31%

+10.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

1.06%

+13.36%

Dividends

PPT vs. PSDYX - Dividend Comparison

PPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than PSDYX's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPT
Putnam Premier Income Trust
9.12%8.81%8.76%8.74%8.60%7.31%8.84%7.73%6.84%5.85%6.28%6.30%
PSDYX
Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund
3.97%4.65%4.81%3.65%1.30%0.37%1.09%2.51%2.23%1.29%0.88%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PPT and PSDYX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPT has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to PSDYX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPT dropped -49.76% vs PSDYX's -2.58%.

PSDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPT and PSDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer