PPT vs. M
PPT (Putnam Premier Income Trust) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Putnam Investments, while M (Macy's, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PPT returned 4.62%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for M. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPT vs. M - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPT achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than M's 5.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PPT has outperformed M with an annualized return of 4.62%, while M has yielded a comparatively lower 0.17% annualized return.
PPT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 1.98%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
M
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -9.53%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 88.69%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 0.17%
PPT vs. M - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPT Putnam Premier Income Trust | 1.28% | 8.39% | 8.80% | 7.43% | -7.75% | -1.72% | -6.54% | 25.53% | -6.36% | 13.78% |
M Macy's, Inc. | 5.27% | 36.55% | -12.41% | 1.64% | -18.66% | 135.80% | -31.08% | -38.20% | 23.64% | -25.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPT and M is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 1992 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPT vs. M — Risk / Return Rank
PPT
M
PPT vs. M - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) and Macy's, Inc. (M). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPT | M | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.34 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 3.12 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.86 | 7.47 | -6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPT vs. M - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPT drawdown since its inception was -49.76%, smaller than the maximum M drawdown of -91.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPT and M.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPT | M | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.76% | -91.95% | +42.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.05% | -28.61% | +23.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | -51.33% | +42.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.46% | -69.65% | +52.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.79% | -87.79% | +56.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -49.80% | +46.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -34.64% | +23.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 11.91% | -9.61% |
Volatility
PPT vs. M - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) is 2.01%, while Macy's, Inc. (M) has a volatility of 14.44%. This indicates that PPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than M based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPT | M | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.01% | 14.44% | -12.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.90% | 30.16% | -23.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.30% | 46.36% | -37.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 54.12% | -42.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 56.26% | -41.82% |
Dividends
PPT vs. M - Dividend Comparison
PPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than M's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M Macy's, Inc. | 3.28% | 3.31% | 4.10% | 3.29% | 3.05% | 1.15% | 3.36% | 8.88% | 5.07% | 5.99% | 4.17% | 3.98% |
PPT Putnam Premier Income Trust | 9.10% | 8.81% | 8.76% | 8.74% | 8.60% | 7.31% | 8.84% | 7.73% | 6.84% | 5.85% | 6.28% | 6.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPT and M have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
M has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to PPT (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPT dropped -49.76% vs M's -91.95%.
M currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPT and M
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer