PPT vs. CRMVX
PPT (Putnam Premier Income Trust) and CRMVX (Potomac Managed Volatility Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PPT returned 2.33%/yr vs 2.56%/yr for CRMVX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PPT vs. CRMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPT achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than CRMVX's 2.01% return.
PPT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 2.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
CRMVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 7.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
PPT vs. CRMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPT Putnam Premier Income Trust | 0.99% | 8.39% | 8.80% | 7.43% | -7.75% | -1.72% | 2.52% |
CRMVX Potomac Managed Volatility Fund | 2.01% | 4.91% | 1.22% | 0.25% | 4.76% | 0.61% | 3.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPT and CRMVX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPT vs. CRMVX — Risk / Return Rank
PPT
CRMVX
PPT vs. CRMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) and Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPT | CRMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.35 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 3.28 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 11.96 | -10.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPT vs. CRMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPT drawdown since its inception was -49.76%, smaller than the maximum CRMVX drawdown of -97.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPT and CRMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPT | CRMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.76% | -97.39% | +47.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.05% | -2.25% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | -97.39% | +88.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.35% | -97.39% | +79.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -97.10% | +93.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -24.72% | +13.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 0.62% | +1.62% |
Volatility
PPT vs. CRMVX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Premier Income Trust (PPT) and Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) have volatilities of 1.76% and 1.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPT | CRMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 1.68% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 3.23% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.33% | 4.24% | +5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.93% | 1,600.31% | -1,588.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 1,463.11% | -1,448.66% |
Dividends
PPT vs. CRMVX - Dividend Comparison
PPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than CRMVX's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMVX Potomac Managed Volatility Fund | 5.64% | 5.75% | 3.75% | 2.74% | 0.57% | 2.59% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPT Putnam Premier Income Trust | 9.12% | 8.81% | 8.76% | 8.74% | 8.60% | 7.31% | 8.84% | 7.73% | 6.84% | 5.85% | 6.28% | 6.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPT and CRMVX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPT has higher volatility (1.76%) compared to CRMVX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPT dropped -49.76% vs CRMVX's -97.39%.
CRMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PPT and CRMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer