PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPLIX vs. PHTJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPLIX vs. PHTJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPLIX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than PHTJX's 8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PPLIX has outperformed PHTJX with an annualized return of 11.60%, while PHTJX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.


PPLIX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.65%
YTD
9.45%
6M
9.80%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.60%

PHTJX

1D
0.36%
1M
3.84%
YTD
8.12%
6M
8.45%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPLIX vs. PHTJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.45%17.55%19.12%20.36%-18.78%17.04%16.56%26.67%-8.74%22.12%
PHTJX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund
8.12%15.57%12.67%16.45%-17.37%15.57%15.13%22.69%-8.00%18.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PPLIX and PHTJX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.99

The correlation between PPLIX and PHTJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPLIX vs. PHTJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPLIX
PPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PHTJX
PHTJX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHTJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTJX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTJX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPLIX vs. PHTJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPLIXPHTJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.22

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

14.61

-2.56

PPLIX vs. PHTJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the PHTJX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPLIX and PHTJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPLIXPHTJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.41

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.64

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.77

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.71

-0.25

Drawdowns

PPLIX vs. PHTJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than PHTJX's maximum drawdown of -27.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPLIX and PHTJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPLIXPHTJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.61%

-27.17%

-28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-6.47%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-11.58%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-23.12%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-27.17%

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-4.19%

-4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.42%

+0.48%

Volatility

PPLIX vs. PHTJX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) at 2.70%. This indicates that PPLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHTJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPLIXPHTJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

2.70%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

6.94%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

8.66%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

11.79%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

12.51%

+3.08%

PPLIX vs. PHTJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPLIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PHTJX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PPLIX vs. PHTJX - Dividend Comparison

PPLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, more than PHTJX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHTJX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund
4.33%4.68%4.09%3.37%8.44%4.96%3.98%3.71%4.01%2.31%1.99%1.67%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.09%9.95%11.56%4.41%9.40%8.04%5.23%7.16%8.64%5.12%4.82%6.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PPLIX and PHTJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PPLIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to PHTJX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PPLIX dropped -55.61% vs PHTJX's -27.17%.

PHTJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPLIX and PHTJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer