PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while XDW0.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPFB.DE returned 28.05%/yr vs 14.54%/yr for XDW0.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPFB.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.DE.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.DE's 31.10% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 31.10%
- 6M
- 30.99%
- 1Y
- 36.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 31.10% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.19% | 53.95% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and XDW0.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between PPFB.DE and XDW0.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
XDW0.DE
PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 2.57 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 8.23 | -3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.DE drawdown of -66.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and XDW0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -66.27% | +49.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -15.05% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -23.70% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -8.52% | -6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -23.00% | +18.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 4.71% | +1.84% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 5.11%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 6.78% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 18.98% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 21.83% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 24.12% | -7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 26.55% | -10.42% |
PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPFB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPFB.DE nor XDW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and XDW0.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
PPFB.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while XDW0.DE is Energy Equities. PPFB.DE tracks Gold, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PPFB.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and XDW0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer