PPFB.DE vs. SLVO
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while SLVO is a Silver fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PPFB.DE returned 31.16% vs 51.43% for SLVO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PPFB.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SLVO.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while SLVO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than SLVO's 9.41% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 31.16%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVO
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 51.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPFB.DE vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 16.49% |
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN | 9.41% | 50.88% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and SLVO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PPFB.DE and SLVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
SLVO
PPFB.DE vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PPFB.DE | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.09 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 12.20 | -7.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPFB.DE | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.78 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.32 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVO drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and SLVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -16.71% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -16.71% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -7.40% | -7.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -3.36% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 4.23% | +2.32% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. SLVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 5.11%, while UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 7.36% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 26.71% | -6.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 29.08% | -5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 24.74% | -8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 24.74% | -8.61% |
PPFB.DE vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPFB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison
PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN | 49.12% | 19.35% | 14.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and SLVO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SLVO.
PPFB.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SLVO is Silver. PPFB.DE tracks Gold, while SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PPFB.DE and 0.65% for SLVO.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and SLVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer