PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PPFB.DE returned 28.05%/yr vs 58.88%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPFB.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 62.48% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 4.14%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 62.48%
- 6M
- 68.29%
- 1Y
- 121.02%
- 3Y*
- 58.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 0.14% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 62.48% | 32.60% | 66.51% | 74.52% | -34.67% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.02 |
The correlation between PPFB.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
LSMC.DE
PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.54 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 9.37 | -7.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 29.27 | -24.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -39.64% | +23.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -12.84% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -36.22% | +19.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -4.14% | -10.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -11.43% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 4.12% | +2.43% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 5.11%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 11.74% | -6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 23.59% | -3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 31.34% | -8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 32.33% | -16.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 32.33% | -16.20% |
PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPFB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPFB.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
PPFB.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. PPFB.DE tracks Gold, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PPFB.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer