PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and JEIP.L (JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while JEIP.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by JPMorgan. PPFB.DE is passively managed, while JEIP.L is actively managed. Over the past year, PPFB.DE returned 31.35% vs 7.81% for JEIP.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PPFB.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEIP.L.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while JEIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JEIP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than JEIP.L's 1.98% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEIP.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 7.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | -1.14% |
JEIP.L JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.98% | -4.40% | -20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and JEIP.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
JEIP.L
PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.41 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 3.92 | +0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum JEIP.L drawdown of -32.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and JEIP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -32.24% | +15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -5.50% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -22.22% | +7.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -23.42% | +19.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 1.99% | +4.56% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L) at 1.95%. This indicates that PPFB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 1.95% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 6.07% | +14.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 8.53% | +14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 20.21% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 20.21% | -4.08% |
PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPFB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JEIP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. JEIP.L - Dividend Comparison
PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEIP.L JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist | 7.93% | 7.18% | 0.61% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and JEIP.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEIP.L.
PPFB.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while JEIP.L is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PPFB.DE and 0.35% for JEIP.L.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and JEIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer