PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while GBSS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GBSS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than GBSS.L's 4.64% return.


PPFB.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.18%
1Y
31.16%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
10Y*

GBSS.L

1D
0.52%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
4.64%
6M
6.16%
1Y
29.67%
3Y*
27.55%
5Y*
19.35%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
2.74%49.11%34.17%9.42%7.03%3.62%
GBSS.L
Gold Bullion Securities
4.66%45.14%33.99%9.23%5.76%4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PPFB.DE and GBSS.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021

0.93

The correlation between PPFB.DE and GBSS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GBSS.L
GBSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GBSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPFB.DEGBSS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.71

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

4.44

+0.16

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the GBSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPFB.DE and GBSS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPFB.DEGBSS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.61

+0.65

Drawdowns

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum GBSS.L drawdown of -37.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and GBSS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPFB.DEGBSS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-37.11%

+20.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.60%

-17.26%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-17.26%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.00%

-15.50%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-12.27%

+7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

6.67%

-0.12%

Volatility

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L) have volatilities of 5.11% and 5.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPFB.DEGBSS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

5.01%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

19.96%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

22.97%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

16.22%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

14.81%

+1.32%

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PPFB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GBSS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PPFB.DE vs. GBSS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PPFB.DE nor GBSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PPFB.DE and GBSS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GBSS.L.

Both ETFs track Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PPFB.DE and 0.40% for GBSS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and GBSS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer