PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PPFB.DE is a Gold fund tracking the Gold, while EUNN.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PPFB.DE returned 17.85%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for EUNN.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 15.08% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- 6M
- -11.49%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- 25.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- YTD
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 32.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | -6.38% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 15.08% | 13.46% | 12.91% | 15.16% | -11.48% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and EUNN.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between PPFB.DE and EUNN.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (5 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
EUNN.DE
PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 3.27 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 10.78 | -8.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum EUNN.DE drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and EUNN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.54% | -28.56% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.54% | -9.58% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | -15.81% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -19.41% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.54% | -6.26% | -16.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -6.83% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.58% | 2.91% | +6.67% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) have volatilities of 6.29% and 6.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 6.29% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.19% | 15.79% | +5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.61% | 19.09% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 16.28% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 16.14% | +0.31% |
PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PPFB.DE and EUNN.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPFB.DE nor EUNN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and EUNN.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE and EUNN.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
PPFB.DE is categorized as Gold, while EUNN.DE is Japan Equities. PPFB.DE tracks Gold, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and EUNN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer