PPFB.DE vs. BRK-B
PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the Gold, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, PPFB.DE returned 28.05%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for BRK-B. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PPFB.DE vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -1.17% return.
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
PPFB.DE vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -1.17% | -2.27% | 35.48% | 12.00% | 9.71% | 11.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PPFB.DE and BRK-B is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPFB.DE vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
PPFB.DE
BRK-B
PPFB.DE vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PPFB.DE | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.01 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | -0.00 | +1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | -0.01 | +4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PPFB.DE vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -45.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPFB.DE | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.60% | -45.91% | +29.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -11.04% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -20.62% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -14.83% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -9.74% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 5.05% | +1.50% |
Volatility
PPFB.DE vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.31%. This indicates that PPFB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPFB.DE | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 4.31% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 11.44% | +8.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 15.11% | +8.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 17.39% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 20.11% | -3.98% |
Dividends
PPFB.DE vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPFB.DE nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PPFB.DE and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer