PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPFB.DE vs. AMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PPFB.DE vs. AMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PPFB.DE is traded in EUR, while AMD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPFB.DE achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than AMD's 142.55% return.


PPFB.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
2.74%
6M
5.47%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
10Y*

AMD

1D
4.82%
1M
16.28%
YTD
142.55%
6M
146.29%
1Y
332.46%
3Y*
56.48%
5Y*
45.78%
10Y*
60.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PPFB.DE vs. AMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
2.74%49.11%34.17%9.42%7.03%2.86%
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
142.55%56.26%-12.65%120.77%-52.20%71.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PPFB.DE and AMD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.02

The correlation between PPFB.DE and AMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPFB.DE vs. AMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

AMD
AMD Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMD Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPFB.DE vs. AMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PPFB.DEAMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.60

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

11.86

-10.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

24.28

-19.68

PPFB.DE vs. AMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the AMD Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPFB.DE and AMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PPFB.DE vs. AMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPFB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.60%, smaller than the maximum AMD drawdown of -86.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFB.DE and AMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PPFB.DEAMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-86.47%

+69.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.60%

-28.26%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

-63.06%

+46.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.00%

-5.46%

-9.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-41.85%

+37.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

13.77%

-7.22%

Volatility

PPFB.DE vs. AMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) is 5.11%, while Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) has a volatility of 21.92%. This indicates that PPFB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PPFB.DEAMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

21.92%

-16.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.18%

49.00%

-28.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

66.48%

-43.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

54.90%

-38.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

56.87%

-40.74%

Dividends

PPFB.DE vs. AMD - Dividend Comparison

Neither PPFB.DE nor AMD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PPFB.DE and AMD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PPFB.DE and AMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer