PPDX.L vs. SGLN.L
PPDX.L (WisdomTree Physical Palladium) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - PPDX.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Palladium Price, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. PPDX.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
PPDX.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PPDX.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 31.48%
- 3Y*
- 27.01%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PPDX.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
PPDX.L
SGLN.L
PPDX.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Palladium (PPDX.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PPDX.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.25 | — |
Drawdowns
PPDX.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PPDX.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -53.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -17.98% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -24.71% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.77% | — |
Volatility
PPDX.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PPDX.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 23.32% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.73% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.80% | — |
PPDX.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PPDX.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PPDX.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PPDX.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PPDX.L.
PPDX.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while SGLN.L is Gold. PPDX.L tracks LBMA Palladium Price, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PPDX.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for PPDX.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer