POCT vs. ZMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR).
POCT and ZMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. POCT is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2018. ZMAR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 3, 2025.
Performance
POCT vs. ZMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
POCT vs. ZMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | -1.84% | 10.83% |
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.33% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than ZMAR's 0.33% return.
POCT
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMAR
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
POCT vs. ZMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both POCT and ZMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Return for Risk
POCT vs. ZMAR — Risk / Return Rank
POCT
ZMAR
POCT vs. ZMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POCT | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 2.28 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 3.60 | -2.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.54 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 3.79 | -2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | 19.05 | -10.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POCT | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.28 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.83 | -1.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between POCT and ZMAR is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
POCT vs. ZMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither POCT nor ZMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
POCT vs. ZMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, which is greater than ZMAR's maximum drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and ZMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| POCT | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -2.30% | -16.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -1.92% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -0.77% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -0.25% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 0.38% | +0.95% |
Volatility
POCT vs. ZMAR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) at 1.19%. This indicates that POCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| POCT | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 1.19% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.13% | 1.67% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 3.11% | +7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.90% | 3.21% | +4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 3.21% | +7.10% |