PMTGX vs. FUMBX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIA MBS Bond Fund (PMTGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX).
PMTGX is managed by PIA Mutual Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2006. FUMBX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2005.
Performance
PMTGX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PMTGX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMTGX PIA MBS Bond Fund | -0.09% | 7.83% | 0.96% | 4.73% | -11.37% | -1.18% | 3.85% | 6.02% | 0.76% | 0.15% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.16% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMTGX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than FUMBX's 0.16% return.
PMTGX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.21%
FUMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PMTGX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMTGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PMTGX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank
PMTGX
FUMBX
PMTGX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA MBS Bond Fund (PMTGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMTGX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.65 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 2.61 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.49 | -0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 8.60 | -4.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMTGX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.65 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.47 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.74 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PMTGX and FUMBX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PMTGX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison
PMTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FUMBX's 3.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMTGX PIA MBS Bond Fund | 3.78% | 4.10% | 4.16% | 3.48% | 2.17% | 0.79% | 2.12% | 2.96% | 2.76% | 2.75% | 2.96% | 2.79% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.67% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PMTGX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMTGX drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, which is greater than FUMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMTGX and FUMBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMTGX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.09% | -8.83% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -1.54% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.86% | -8.60% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -0.80% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -1.88% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 0.44% | +0.72% |
Volatility
PMTGX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison
PIA MBS Bond Fund (PMTGX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) at 0.83%. This indicates that PMTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PMTGX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 0.83% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.83% | 1.39% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.94% | 2.32% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 2.89% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 2.49% | +2.23% |