PMSE vs. KMAR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PMSE (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September) and KMAR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds. PMSE is actively managed, while KMAR is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMSE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KMAR.

Performance

PMSE vs. KMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September (PMSE) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMSE achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than KMAR's 11.64% return.

PMSE

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.97%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KMAR

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 11.64%
• 6M: 10.55%
• 1Y: 25.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMSE vs. KMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMSE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September	2.97%	2.13%
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March	11.64%	5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PMSE and KMAR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

PMSE vs. KMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMSE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KMAR

KMAR Risk / Return Rank: 88
KMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
KMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
KMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
KMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
KMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMSE vs. KMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September (PMSE) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMSE	KMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.91	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.51	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	21.30	—

Drawdowns

PMSE vs. KMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMSE drawdown since its inception was -1.44%, smaller than the maximum KMAR drawdown of -11.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMSE and KMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMSE	KMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-11.32%	+9.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-1.34%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMSE	KMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28%	9.45%	-7.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.28%	12.17%	-9.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.28%	12.17%	-9.89%

PMSE vs. KMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMSE vs. KMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMSE nor KMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMSE and KMAR in my portfolio?

PMSE and KMAR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMSE or KMAR?

On fees, PMSE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMSE or KMAR?

PMSE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMSE or KMAR?

PMSE and KMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PMSE and KMAR?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMSE and 0.79% for KMAR.