PMSE vs. FBUF
PMSE (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMSE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.
Performance
PMSE vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMSE achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 5.54% return.
PMSE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- 19.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMSE vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMSE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September | 2.86% | 2.23% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 5.54% | 6.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMSE and FBUF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMSE vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
PMSE
FBUF
PMSE vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September (PMSE) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMSE | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.05 | 1.48 | +1.57 |
Drawdowns
PMSE vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMSE drawdown since its inception was -1.44%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMSE and FBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMSE | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -11.09% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -1.37% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.25% | — |
Volatility
PMSE vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMSE | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 7.48% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.27% | 9.54% | -7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.27% | 9.54% | -7.27% |
PMSE vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMSE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMSE vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
PMSE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.54% |
PMSE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMSE and FBUF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMSE.
FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for PMSE.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMSE and 0.48% for FBUF.
Find the right allocation for PMSE and FBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer