PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMMY vs. TDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMMY vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMMY achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than TDEC's 9.40% return.


PMMY

1D
0.26%
1M
0.80%
6M
2.60%
YTD
2.98%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.95%

TDEC

1D
0.71%
1M
1.79%
6M
4.73%
YTD
9.40%
1Y
18.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$161.04$4.27K$29.08K
$49.72K$73.74K$193.92K

PMMY vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMMY and TDEC is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.53

The correlation between PMMY and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMMY vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMMY
PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMMY vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMMYTDECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.36

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.99

2.28

+6.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.91

9.26

+37.65

PMMY vs. TDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMMY Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the TDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMMY and TDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMMY vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMMY drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum TDEC drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMMY and TDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMMYTDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-10.30%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.60%

-8.16%

+7.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.55%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-1.12%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

2.01%

-1.90%

Volatility

PMMY vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) is 0.62%, while FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that PMMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMMYTDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

3.45%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.22%

10.28%

-9.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42%

11.07%

-9.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.55%

11.96%

-10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.55%

11.96%

-10.41%

PMMY vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMMY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMMY vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMMY nor TDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMMY and TDEC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDEC has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to PMMY (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMMY dropped -0.60% vs TDEC's -10.30%.

On 1-year performance, TDEC leads with 18.55% vs 5.35% for PMMY. On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PMMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDEC has performed better with a 18.55% return vs 5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

PMMY and TDEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMMY and 0.95% for TDEC.

PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMMY and TDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer