PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMMY vs. PSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMMY vs. PSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMMY achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly higher than PSH's 1.88% return.


PMMY

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.74%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSH

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.08%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.38%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMMY vs. PSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMMY and PSH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMMY vs. PSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMMY
PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PSH
PSH Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMMY vs. PSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMMYPSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.45

1.43

+1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.90

4.33

+12.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

89.69

12.80

+76.89

PMMY vs. PSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMMY Sharpe Ratio is 5.35, which is higher than the PSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMMY and PSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMMYPSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.35

2.04

+3.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.56

2.21

+2.35

Drawdowns

PMMY vs. PSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMMY drawdown since its inception was -0.36%, smaller than the maximum PSH drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMMY and PSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMMYPSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-3.06%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.36%

-1.42%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.16%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-0.27%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.48%

-0.41%

Volatility

PMMY vs. PSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) is 0.36%, while PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that PMMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMMYPSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.69%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

2.10%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12%

3.02%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.39%

3.26%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.39%

3.26%

-1.87%

PMMY vs. PSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMMY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PSH's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMMY vs. PSH - Dividend Comparison

PMMY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%.


PositionTTM20252024
PMMY
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSH
PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF
6.66%6.62%8.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMMY and PSH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSH has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to PMMY (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMMY dropped -0.36% vs PSH's -3.06%.

On 1-year performance, PSH leads with 6.11% vs 5.98% for PMMY. On fees, PSH is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PMMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PSH has performed better with a 6.11% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSH is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMMY.

PSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 0.00% for PMMY.

PMMY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PSH is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMMY and 0.45% for PSH.

PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMMY and PSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer