PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMLP.L (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) and GCLX.L (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - PMLP.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while GCLX.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PMLP.L returned 19.87%/yr vs -3.38%/yr for GCLX.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMLP.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCLX.L.

Performance

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMLP.L achieves a 26.71% return, which is significantly lower than GCLX.L's 37.29% return.

PMLP.L

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 26.71%
• 6M: 26.31%
• 1Y: 28.41%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: 19.87%
• 10Y*: —

GCLX.L

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 6.85%
• YTD: 37.29%
• 6M: 39.11%
• 1Y: 91.83%
• 3Y*: 5.68%
• 5Y*: -3.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	26.71%	-1.40%	35.81%	7.61%	35.33%	17.44%
GCLX.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc	37.29%	32.48%	-25.40%	-15.38%	-22.45%	-19.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PMLP.L and GCLX.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021	0.25

The correlation between PMLP.L and GCLX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PMLP.L	GCLX.L
Energy	100.0%	13.6%
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.9%
Financial Services	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	47.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	6.8%
Utilities	-	16.1%

Return for Risk

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMLP.L

PMLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
PMLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PMLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PMLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PMLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PMLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

GCLX.L

GCLX.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
GCLX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GCLX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GCLX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GCLX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GCLX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMLP.L	GCLX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	4.36	-2.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	5.09	-3.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.69	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	8.56	-5.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	28.52	-20.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the GCLX.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMLP.L and GCLX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMLP.L	GCLX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	4.36	-2.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	-0.13	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	-0.24	+1.51

Drawdowns

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMLP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum GCLX.L drawdown of -69.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMLP.L and GCLX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMLP.L	GCLX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.50%	-69.45%	+48.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.82%	-10.67%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.50%	-52.84%	+32.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.50%	-68.40%	+47.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.31%	-28.47%	+24.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-40.38%	+34.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	3.21%	+0.52%

Volatility

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) is 7.40%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLX.L) has a volatility of 8.69%. This indicates that PMLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCLX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMLP.L	GCLX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.40%	8.69%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.48%	14.49%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	21.03%	-2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.86%	25.59%	-5.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.34%	26.21%	-4.87%

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMLP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GCLX.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMLP.L vs. GCLX.L - Dividend Comparison

PMLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while GCLX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GCLX.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	2.74%	3.31%	3.37%	6.48%	6.12%	6.57%	4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMLP.L and GCLX.L in my portfolio?

PMLP.L and GCLX.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMLP.L or GCLX.L?

On fees, PMLP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMLP.L or GCLX.L?

PMLP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCLX.L.

What is the main difference between PMLP.L and GCLX.L?

PMLP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while GCLX.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PMLP.L and 0.60% for GCLX.L.