PMJN vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMJN (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMJN returned 6.52% vs 21.47% for PQAP. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

PMJN vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJN achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.

PMJN

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.88%
• 1Y: 6.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJN vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMJN PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June	2.33%	4.21%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	12.09%	8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PMJN and PQAP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.78

The correlation between PMJN and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PMJN vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMJN

PMJN Risk / Return Rank: 95
PMJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PMJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PMJN Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PMJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PMJN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMJN vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMJN	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.75	4.86	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.20	8.47	-2.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.97	2.20	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.69	15.50	-9.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	37.72	86.25	-48.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMJN vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMJN Sharpe Ratio is 3.75, which is comparable to the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMJN and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMJN	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75	4.86	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.81	1.76	+2.05

Drawdowns

PMJN vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJN drawdown since its inception was -1.15%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJN and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMJN	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.15%	-10.79%	+9.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.15%	-1.39%	+0.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.12%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-0.60%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	0.25%	-0.08%

Volatility

PMJN vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) is 0.19%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that PMJN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMJN	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.19%	1.02%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.42%	3.09%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75%	4.45%	-2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.75%	11.03%	-9.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.75%	11.03%	-9.28%

PMJN vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMJN and PQAP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

PMJN vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

PMJN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
PMJN PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMJN and PQAP in my portfolio?

PMJN and PQAP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMJN or PQAP?

PQAP has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to PMJN (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMJN dropped -1.15% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, PMJN or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 21.47% vs 6.52% for PMJN. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, PMJN has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMJN or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMJN or PQAP?

PMJN and PQAP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMJN or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for PMJN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 3.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.