PMJN vs. AUGM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PMJN (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June) and AUGM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMJN returned 6.64% vs 7.67% for AUGM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMJN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for AUGM.

Performance

PMJN vs. AUGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - August (AUGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJN achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than AUGM's 2.77% return.

PMJN

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.96%
• 1Y: 6.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AUGM

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 2.77%
• 6M: 3.22%
• 1Y: 7.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJN vs. AUGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMJN PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June	2.45%	4.21%
AUGM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - August	2.77%	4.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PMJN and AUGM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.83

The correlation between PMJN and AUGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PMJN vs. AUGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMJN

PMJN Risk / Return Rank: 96
PMJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PMJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PMJN Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PMJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PMJN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

AUGM

AUGM Risk / Return Rank: 93
AUGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AUGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AUGM Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AUGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AUGM Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMJN vs. AUGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - August (AUGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMJN	AUGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.82	3.39	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.31	5.39	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.99	1.75	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.80	4.76	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.42	26.34	+12.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMJN vs. AUGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMJN Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is comparable to the AUGM Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMJN and AUGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMJN	AUGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82	3.39	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.87	1.87	+2.00

Drawdowns

PMJN vs. AUGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJN drawdown since its inception was -1.15%, smaller than the maximum AUGM drawdown of -4.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJN and AUGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMJN	AUGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.15%	-4.27%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.15%	-1.62%	+0.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-0.35%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	0.29%	-0.12%

Volatility

PMJN vs. AUGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) is 0.22%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - August (AUGM) has a volatility of 0.25%. This indicates that PMJN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMJN	AUGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.22%	0.25%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.43%	1.73%	-0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75%	2.27%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.74%	3.55%	-1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.74%	3.55%	-1.81%

PMJN vs. AUGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMJN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AUGM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMJN vs. AUGM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMJN nor AUGM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMJN and AUGM in my portfolio?

PMJN and AUGM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMJN or AUGM?

AUGM has higher volatility (0.25%) compared to PMJN (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMJN dropped -1.15% vs AUGM's -4.27%.

Which ETF is better, PMJN or AUGM?

On 1-year performance, AUGM leads with 7.67% vs 6.64% for PMJN. On fees, PMJN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMJN or AUGM?

Over the 1-year period, AUGM has performed better with a 7.67% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMJN or AUGM?

PMJN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AUGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMJN or AUGM?

PMJN and AUGM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PMJN and AUGM?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMJN and 0.85% for AUGM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMJN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 3.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.