PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMFLX vs. MUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMFLX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Flexible Municipal Income Fund (PMFLX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PMFLX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-1.86%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MUC

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.70%
6M
-1.10%
YTD
3.33%
1Y
10.54%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
-3.19%
10Y*
0.53%
ALL TIME*
3.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.02M$3.71M$3.50M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PMFLX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMFLX and MUC is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMFLX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMFLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MUC
MUC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMFLX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Flexible Municipal Income Fund (PMFLX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMFLXMUCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

PMFLX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMFLX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMFLX drawdown since its inception was -2.06%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMFLX and MUC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMFLXMUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-48.97%

+46.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-17.08%

+15.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.47%

-9.93%

+9.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

Volatility

PMFLX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMFLXMUCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

8.19%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.58%

11.47%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

11.88%

-8.30%

PMFLX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMFLX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMFLX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

PMFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than MUC's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
6.07%6.06%5.62%3.84%5.79%4.27%3.96%3.90%4.99%5.14%5.45%5.46%
PMFLX
PIMCO Flexible Municipal Income Fund
0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMFLX and MUC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMFLX and MUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer